When a company faces a tax assessment, it is common to focus all efforts on preparing a legal defense strategy.
However, there is one aspect that is often underestimated and can have immediate consequences for business operations:
Properly securing the tax claim.
Because challenging a tax assessment is not always enough. It is equally essential to properly secure the tax claim in order to prevent the tax authority from taking collection actions that could disrupt the continuity of the business.
During a tax dispute, the tax authority may require the taxpayer to secure the disputed amount while the legal proceeding is being resolved.
If the security is not properly established or fails to meet the legal requirements, significant consequences may arise, including:
In many cases, the operational risk can be even more serious than the tax assessment itself.
The Código Fiscal de la Federación provides several legal alternatives for securing a tax claim, including:
Although each of these mechanisms is legally valid, not every option is appropriate for every taxpayer.
The right choice should take into account each company’s financial, operational, and asset-related circumstances.
Experience shows that improperly structured security may be rejected by the tax authority.
This can result in:
For this reason, selecting the most appropriate alternative requires strategic analysis and proper documentation from the outset.
Securing a tax claim should not be viewed merely as a legal requirement.
It is also a strategic tool that helps companies:
A well-designed strategy can make a significant difference throughout the entire proceeding.
At Guerrero y Santana, we have advised domestic and international companies in complex tax disputes before government authorities, helping them to:
Every case requires an individualized analysis and a solution aligned with the company’s objectives.
If your company is currently facing a tax assessment or a collection proceeding, taking timely action is essential.
The right strategy may make the difference between preserving operational stability and facing enforcement measures that could compromise your assets, liquidity, and ability to operate.
